RECENT PUBLICATIONS

De Rijcke, S. & Stockelova, T. (in press). Predatory Publishing and the Imperative of International Productivity: Feeding off and feeding up the dominant. In: Biagioli, M. & Lippman, A. (eds.) Gaming the Metrics: Misconduct and Manipulation in Academic Research, pp. 101-110. MIT Press, Fall 2019.

Penders B, Holbrook JB, de Rijcke S. (2019). Rinse and Repeat: Understanding the Value of Replication across Different Ways of Knowing. Publications; 7(3): 52.

Wouters, P.F., Sugimoto, C.R., Lariviere, V., McVeigh, M.E., Pulverer, B., de Rijcke, S. & Waltman, L.R. (2019). Rethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal. Nature, 569, 621-623 (30 May 2019).

Wilsdon, J. & de Rijcke, S. (2019). Europe the rule-maker. Nature, 569, 479-481 (23 May 2019).

Franssen, T.P. & de Rijcke, S. (2019). The rise of project funding and its effects on the social structure of academia. In: Cannizzo, F. & Osbaldiston, N. (eds.) The Social Structures of Global Academia. Routledge.

Hessels, L.K., Franssen, T., Scholten, W., & de Rijcke, S. (2019). Variation in Valuation: How Research Groups Accumulate Credibility in Four Epistemic Cultures. Minerva, First published online: 9 January 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s11024-018-09366-x.

Rushforth, A.D., Franssen, T.P. & de Rijcke, S. (2018). Portfolios of Worth. Capitalizing on Basic and Clinical Problems in Biomedical Research Groups. Science, Technology, & Human Values, Article first published online: July 3, 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0162243918786431.

Forsberg, E.M., Anthun, F.O., Bailey, S. et al. (2018). Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement. Science and Engineering Ethics 24(4): 1023–1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0034-4.

Franssen, T.F., Scholten, W., Hessels, L.K. & De Rijcke, S. (2018). The drawbacks of project funding for epistemic innovation. Comparing institutional affordances and constraints of different types of research funding. Minerva. First published online 09 January 2018.

Paul-Hus, A., Desrochers, N., De Rijcke, S. & Rushforth, A.D. (2017). The reward system of scienceAslib Journal of Information Management, 69 (5), 478-485. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-07-2017-0168.

Müller, R. & De Rijcke, S. (2017). Thinking with indicators. Exploring the Epistemic Impacts of Academic Performance Indicators in the Life Sciences. Research Evaluation. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvx023.

Degn, L., Franssen, T.F., Sørensen, M.P. & De Rijcke, S. (2017). Research groups as communities of practice – a case study of four high performing research groups. Higher Education, published online 25 October 2017. DOI 10.1007/s10734-017-0205-2.

Hammarfelt. B., De Rijcke, S. & Wouters, P.F. (2017). From eminent men to excellent universities: University rankings as calculative devicesMinerva, published online 28 June 2017. DOI 10.1007/s11024-017-9329-x.

Fochler, M. & De Rijcke, S. (2017). Implicated in the Indicator Game? An Experimental DebateEngaging Science, Technology, and Society 3: 21-40. DOI:10.17351/ests2017.108

Rushforth, A.D. & De Rijcke, S. (2016). Quality monitoring in transition: The emerging challenge of evaluating translational research programs in academic biomedicineScience and Public Policy, 1-11. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scw078.

De Rijcke, S., Wallenburg, I., Bal, R. & Wouters, P.F. (2016). Comparing Comparisons. On Rankings and Accounting in Hospitals and Universities. In: Deville, J., Guggenheim, M. & Hrdličková, Z. (eds). Practising Comparison: Logics, Relations, Collaborations. Manchester: Mattering Press.

Kaltenbrunner, W. & De Rijcke, S. (2016). The micropolitics of quantifying research output for evaluation in Dutch law schoolsScience and Public Policy, first published online 19 Sept. 2016, doi: 10.1093/scipol/scw064.

Hammarfelt, B., De Rijcke, S. & Rushforth, A.D. (2016). Quantified academic selves: The gamification of science through social networking services. Special issue Information Research on Critical Perspectives on Social Media Research, 21 (2) (June).

De Rijcke, S. et al. (2016). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator uses - A literature reviewResearch Evaluation, 25(2), 161-169.

De Rijcke, S. & Rushforth, A.D. (2015). To intervene, or not to intervene, is that the question? On the role of scientometrics in research evaluation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66 (9), 1954-1958http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23382

Rushforth, A.D. & De Rijcke, S. (2015).  Accounting for impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the making of biomedical research in the NetherlandsMinerva, 53, 117-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11024-015-9274-5

Hicks, D., Wouters, P.F., Rafols, I., De Rijcke, S. & Waltman, L. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics. Nature, 23 April 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/520429a

Hammarfelt & De Rijcke (2015). Accountability in Context: Effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala UniversityResearch Evaluation, 24(1), 63-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu029

Book Chapters

De Rijcke, S. & Beaulieu, A. (2014). Networked Neuroscience. Brain scans and visual knowing at the intersection of atlases and databases. In: New Representation in Scientific Practice, Coopmans, C., Lynch, M., Vertesi, J. & Woolgar, S. (eds.), MIT Press. http://bit.ly/1Uzukgm

De Rijcke, S. (2013). Staging the Studio. Enacting Artful Realities through Digital Photography. In: Hiding Making – Showing Creation. The Studio from Turner to Tacita Dean, Esner, R., Kisters, S. & Lehmann, A.S. (eds.), Amsterdam University Press. http://bit.ly/1J7aSp7

Beaulieu, A., Van Heur, B. & De Rijcke, S. (2012). Authority and Expertise in New Sites of Knowledge Production. In: Virtual Knowledge. Experimenting in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Wouters, P.F., Scharnhorst, A., Beaulieu, A. & Wyatt, S. (eds.). MIT Press.http://bit.ly/1DDJ2i9

Reports

Tatum, Clifford, Alex Rushforth, Thed N. van Leeuwen, and Sarah de Rijcke. 2017. “Epistemic Data Practices: Case Study Report for the CWTS/Elsevier Study on Open Data.” doi:10.17632/bwrnfb4bvh.1. 
Berghmans, Stephane, Helena Cousijn, Gemma Deakin, Ingeborg Meijer, Adrian Mulligan, Andrew Plume, Sarah de Rijcke, et al. 2017. “Open Data: The Researcher Perspective - Survey and Case Studies” 1 (April). https://doi.org/10.17632/bwrnfb4bvh.1.

Wouters, P.F., Thellwall, M., Kousha, K., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., Rushforth, A.D., Franssen, T. (2015). The Metric Tide. Supplementary Report 1 to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. Commissioned by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) Steering Group. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5066.3520

ORCID ID

Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS)

Leiden University

© 2015 by Sarah de Rijcke. Created with Wix.com

  • Twitter Social Icon
  • LinkedIn Social Icon